I believe we are on the horizon of living this way. People are more aware now than ever before on earth and this movie takes us away from our daily lives and just reminds us of what is possible.

It was banned because the ideas are so people empowering . I guess the status quo considered it too much of a threat and didn’t want to give people any ideas of how powerful we are.

By Henry Makow Ph.D.

(originally posted in Feb. 2006)

In 2004, a woman revealed details of Hugh Hefner’s sex life.

If the Playboy founder is any indication, a life dedicated to porn and promiscuity leads to homosexuality and impotence. The 60′s icon of suave masculinity is, in old age, a grotesque self-parody.

Hefner, 82, pays a bevy of whores $2000 a week to be his girlfriends and have sex with him every Wednesday and Friday. He uses Viagra and watches male gay porn to stay erect while as many as ten concubines mount him in succession. The other girls simulate lesbian sex to arouse him.

“He doesn’t really do anything,” says Jill Anne Spaulding, author of the book “Upstairs.” He just lies there with his Viagra erection. It’s just a fake erection, and each girl gets on top of him for two minutes while the girls in the background try to keep him excited. They’ll yell things like, “F-k her daddy, f-k her daddy!” There’s a lot of cheerleader going on!”

No one becomes a playmate without having intercourse with Hefner. The “girl next door” is now a whore; and Hefner’s maudlin example of arrested development is a fitting epitaph for his Playboy Philosophy.

Playboy was not a spontaneous phenomenon. It was social engineering designed to foster homosexuality and family breakdown. See my “Playboy and the (Homo) Sexual Revolution.” This is why Spaulding’s revelations got so little publicity.
DEFINING HOMOSEXUAL AND HETEROSEXUAL
The “establishment” agenda is to destabilize and neuter us by encouraging homosexual behavior. This ensures we don’t propagate since homosexuals have sex but don’t have children.

They redefine “homosexual” as a “sexual preference” or “lifestyle choice” rather than a developmental disorder so as to entrap us. Never mind that the vast majority of homosexuals come from dysfunctional families or suffered sexual abuse as youths. Our reluctance to embrace homosexuality is considered “bigotry.”

In response, let’s take liberties with these definitions ourselves. Having the right paradigm is the key to healthy behavior.

Forget about what you normally think of gay or straight (same-sex , opposite sex attraction etc.) Think of heterosexuality as monogamous and dedicated to rearing children; homosexuality as promiscuous and concerned with sex for its own sake.

Heterosexuality involves bonding permanently with a member of the opposite sex for love and usually procreation. It is participating in the natural life cycle, in the intrinsic meaning of life. Personal and societal health depend on heterosexuality.

Homosexuality is a form of arrested development caused by an inability to form a heterosexual bond. As a result, homosexuals compensate using sex as a surrogate for love.

In these terms, society has become more homosexual because, due to social engineering (i.e. the “sexual revolution,” feminism) many heterosexuals now fail to permanently bond. Normally, happily married heterosexuals can put sex in perspective and move on to more important things.

A perceptive reader recently wrote me: “If heterosexual sex outside of marriage is acceptable, if we eliminate the procreative aspect from sex, are heterosexuals any different from homosexuals in regards to the sexual activity?”

Exactly. I know these definitions are not “politically correct.” PC is propaganda, social engineering and mind control. PC is an old Communist Party (i.e. Illuminati) term.

I do not disparage gays. According to my definitions, the vast majority of homosexuals are really “heterosexuals” like Hugh Hefner. And a small minority of homosexuals are monogamous and partake in some heterosexual values.

HOW SEX BECAME AN ACT OF HATE
Last year I wrote: “Throughout modern history Illuminati bankers have used “sexual liberation” to subvert society and establish their subtle tyranny. As Masonic revolutionary Giuseppe Mazzini said, “we corrupt in order to rule.”

The Illuminati bankers need to introduce “world government” to translate their unjust monopoly over credit into total world control.

They realized that they couldn’t take control until they destroyed the family. This was a main plank of the Communist Manifesto in 1848, along with the creation of a private central bank.

Every major “revolution” in modern history has increased Illuminati banker control and the sexual revolution is no exception.

The Illuminati used Hugh Hefner’s “Playboy” to divorce sex from love, marriage and family. They own the major cartels and control the media through advertising.

The movies are very effective in fostering homosexuality. Sex is often something reserved for your enemies. Recently I saw “Dr. No” (1962) again. The fashionable James Bond has sex with a woman even after he realizes she is involved in an attempt to kill him. After they have sex, Bond has her imprisoned.

In the movie Munich (2006), the Israeli assassins confront an attractive woman who killed their colleague. She displays her goods and suggests her death would be “a waste of talent.” She thinks they might have sex with a woman they intend to kill.

Human beings are malleable and take their standards from movies. There is nothing so destructive to human society as the separation of sex and love. It reduces men to dogs, and women to fire hydrants.

The Illuminati wishes to harness sex in the interests of hate. Love is the enemy of hate and must be destroyed.

ALL PORN IS GAY
According to our definition of homosexuality, (i.e. promiscuity outside of love and/or procreation), all pornography is gay. The porn consumer is engaged in a promiscuous masturbatory fantasy. He is not focused on his marriage and progeny.

From what I have said, it should be clear that homosexuality is incompatible with heterosexuality, just as promiscuity is incompatible with monogamy. Gay activists admit their goal is to destroy heterosexuality.

Pornography is poisoning heterosexuality. There is a place for tasteful nudity as a stopgap while seeking marriage.
(See my “Managing the Male Sex Drive” ) But as you know, pornography has reached epidemic proportions. “Adult Video News” predicts revenue of $12.6 billion this year. The Internet has literally thousands of porn sites. TV and pop music increasingly are pornographic.

Pornography warps the way a man sees all women and girls. Many sites include girls as young as 14. See “Erototoxins”

Young females think they are useful for one thing only. Thousands in the porn industry display what everyone has instead of cultivating what is rare and valuable: femininity.

I hate to burst the bubble on a billion dollar industry: Young naked women are practically identical. They have identical equipment. Boobs and bush. Symmetrical faces. Do men need to see literally thousands of examples?

There is something addictive here. Why don’t men get sick of it? Why don’t they suffer from gynecologist’s fatigue? The plethora of breasts and splayed legs takes the wonder out of sex and causes contempt for women and impotence. Maybe this is the point: new drugs keep people running on empty. (See “The Porn Pharma Complex”)

Sexual attraction is mostly a function of a woman’s fertility. Women are designed to marry and procreate when they are young and most attractive. Marriage ensured that men would have to commit if they wanted sex. By undermining marriage, occult social engineers have turned a critical social and reproductive activity into a lifetime obsession, better to divert, degrade and control the masses.
FINALLY

We were not prepared for the attack on our humanity by “sexual liberation” and porn. We didn’t know our leadership had been subverted by the Illuminati.

Marriage and family are the essential building blocks of society. Family ensures that each new generation is properly nurtured and prepared for life.

Most people receive values, purpose, identity and love from their family roles.

Heterosexuality provides life with profound meaning. There is no greater potential for love than marriage and parenthood.

Raising a child is the supreme act of devotion and faith in God and is practiced and tested every day.

Homosexual social engineering is gradually destroying these sources of happiness and health, personal and societal.

http://www.henrymakow.com/001421.html

A Darwinian, evolutionary perspective helps us understand why children do not readily submit to schooling. Every bone in their body, every neuron, every muscle, resists coercion. Our hunter-gatherer past endowed children with educative drives that are rooted in freedom.

http://www.psychologytoday.com/blog/freedom-learn/201111/why-children-protest-going-school-more-evolutionary-mismatch

• Devices temporarily prevent pregnancy by releasing hormones into the blood
• In 2011, 1,700 girls aged 13/14 were fitted with implants
  
• Under ‘patient confidentiality’ rules, school staff are banned from seeking permission of parents beforehand

The Heretic presents… Les Visible’s “You Might not Feel it but Your Children Will.” From the Core of the Petri Dish.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rwrE05mXWCg&feature=player_embedded

Defense Against the Psychopath is a documentary excerpted from chapter one of my book; The Art of Urban Survival. Teaches people how to recognize and defend against our society’s most dangerous predators, psychopaths.

Free Download of the PDF booklet, Defense Against the Psychopath here: http://www.chinastrategies.com/defenseagainstpsychopath.pdf

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MgGyvxqYSbE&feature=player_embedded

http://www.TheUltimateHistoryLesson.com (notes, transcript, links, and more)
http://www.JohnTaylorGatto.com (all of John’s books, and current projects)
http://www.PeaceRevolution.org (episodes 041-045 cover The Ultimate History Lesson + Analysis)
http://www.TragedyandHope.com (an online community which provides educational media by independent producers)

OUTLINE FOR HOUR 1:

1. Arriving at abstraction, critical thinking and draft evaluations (17:09)

2. The metaphor of schooling and the school of fish. Collective expectations vs. individualism, identity and uniqueness. Volition in group selection. Language theft, Newspeak, Lippmann and the schooling transformation. The language of education becomes respected out of ritual.

3. Awareness of contrary dynamics leading to theories of dialectics. Intellectual self defense, questioning authority. The malign intent against individuality. Reality testing. Conditioned from infancy to shave the truth. Education begins with mistrust.

4. Outcome based education, servile arts vs. independent self sufficiency and life-long learning. The logic of schooling and asking “why?” Teaching experiences spanning 30 years including Gold Coast, Harlem, and Spanish Harlem and the disparity between what Gatto accomplished vs. the Protocol. Teaching his class to asking questions. Visiting delegations. The ideal of 120 individual curricula. Learning more from students than from the Ivy League.

5. The extension of childhood and the economics of planned obsolescence. Lincoln’s Mudsill Moment in 1859. The British are financing the whole western movement and attempting to reinstall their class system. Americans, independent livelihoods and the incompatibility with the concept of the proletariat based factory systems. Private independent systems of value. Slavery, wives of the Plantation owners and the causes of the Civil War. Northern industrialists wage slavery and deadwood.

6. The pulpit and the press. William Rainey Harper and the Chautauqua’s. Mass media. Ideas and ways of thinking introduced to the “best” people. A second American Revolution, controlling public opinion, mechanizing workforces. Carnegie and the elimination of the need for skilled labor.

7. Leverage and the alchemy of wealth, power, fame. Global Governance and Rockefeller lineage. Rockefeller rape allegations. Horatio Alger. “The Rise of the Dangerous Class in New York City”, Adoption institutions, Lowering unit value of labor by encouraging women in the workforce, social work industry rises. Children of Labor sent west in box cars. Lutheran parents with Episcopal Hierarchy, farmers, free labor. Breaking the parental bond. The theory of “Mirror Neurons.”

8. School and un-making connections. Short answer testing, memorization and disjointed thinking. Automatic weight lifting machines.

9. Frustration and Aggression and the removal of volition in schooling. Executive hiring. Cronyism and the illusion of credentialism in higher learning. How to get into Harvard or Princeton. Wealth and Fame. Ambiguous excellence and “added value”. Physical, Mental and Social Hobbies. Team sports vs. carving your own path. Seat less unicycle over broken terrain. Removing imagination. “Garbage in, Garbage out.” (48:00)

10. Standardized testing, the Princeton Review and “What Smart Students Know.” 50/50 Learning. GPA and obedience. Unmasking reality. Bush, Kerry and the “C” Averages. Skull and Bones Presidential Theatre. “Chutzpah” and the contempt for ordinary people. Economic crisis, real estate bubbles, savings and loan and the City Bank of New York. Sophisticated amoral social engineers. Speaking in China. (57:00)

11. Incoherence and the exhausting of national vitality. Prussian education runs its course. Family as the root of Nations. Rhetorical concern and the dependence on constant warfare. The explosion of invention causing the “crisis of capitalism.” Rockefeller, Carnegie, Astor, Vanderbilt undermine education by assembled capital. Small farmers, Entrepreneurs and the transition to the corporate economy.

12. Prussian schooling, Johann Fichte and the “Addresses to the German Nation” Battle of Jena (1806) Spinoza and “Tractatus Theologico Politicus”. Forced schooling to destroy the imagination. Bells, testing, ranking. John Calvin’s “Institutes of the Christian Religion,” Justified Sinners and the elect.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YQiW_l848t8&feature=player_embedded

Plans have been revealed for a free school staffed by former servicemen and women in Greater Manchester.

The Centre for Policy Studies (CPS) said children could be taught using military-style discipline.

The plan’s authors claimed the school would “keep kids out of gang culture”.

Tom Burkard, from the CPS, said the proposed “Phoenix Free School” would use qualified and unqualified teachers, because “teacher training is basically training young people not to teach”.

A report called Something Can Be Done has been produced by Mr Burkard and serving officer Captain AK Burki.

Mr Burkard, a former school teacher and a military instructor, said: “You are told to be a learning facilitator and teach children to manage their own learning.

“An undergraduate has enough trouble managing their own learning – take an illiterate pupil growing up in an inner-city estate, to expect them to manage their learning is in the realms of fantasy.”

‘Enlisting enthusiasm’

If the plans went ahead, Mr Burkard said the school would also use military-style discipline, which he said many people were opposed to because they did not understand it.

“Most people in this country think of military discipline from the standpoint of what it was like under national service,” he said.

“If you have to use your sticks all the time, you are doing something wrong.

“The job of the officer and the NCO is to enlist the enthusiasm to perform difficult tasks under demanding circumstances.

“We think these skills in being able to motivate those who come from difficult areas is the one quality which is going to keep kids out of gang culture.”

Free schools are state-funded but semi-independent, similar to academy schools.

Mr Burkard said Oldham has been considered as a possible venue, but they would start the school in the area where the idea was most popular among parents and the community.

Mr Burkard said his proposals were necessary because of dissatisfaction with existing schools.

“I respect teachers, but with the amount of micro-management, they are unable to react to situations in the way they see fit,” he said.

A similar project, called Troops To Teachers, has been run by the US Departments of Education and Defense for 18 years.

‘Deeply worrying’

Education Secretary Michael Gove has previously described the US system as an ideal example of the coalition government’s concept of Big Society.

However, Ian Fenn, head teacher of Burnage Media Arts College in Manchester, said he found the idea of having ex-military personnel as teachers “deeply worrying”.

“For the first time in my 30 years of teaching experience, we have a situation where there are graduates with PGCEs, good references and lots of experience who cannot get jobs.

“If there is no place for these qualified teachers, why would we need any unqualified ones?”

Speaking on BBC Radio 4′s Today programme, Mary Bousted, general secretary of the Association of Teachers and Lecturers, said she was “amazed” by the proposal.

She said it was not clear what the school would teach, beyond basic numeracy and literacy.

Mr Burkard said pupils would be taught the IGCSE and members of staff would have to have a degree in the subject they were teaching.

However, Ms Bousted said: “It is simply not true that you have just got your degree subject and then you have experience and you don’t need to learn how to teach.”

She said those teaching children needed to understand how to teach, know about different approaches to teaching, including those used internationally.

“The idea that you can simply take the skills and abilities you have learned in war or on the parade ground or through army manoeuvres and those can be translated, undigested, into teaching without any further training is ridiculous,” she said.

If given the go-ahead, the school would open in 2013 with one group of Year Seven pupils. It will be expanded each subsequent year.

Mr Burkard said they needed a minimum of 60 pupils for the school to be viable but said they had been overwhelmed by the response so far.

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-manchester-14754069

Cllr Mike Whitby, gives an interesting speech about the threat of the Frankfurt School and the New World Order. Mike spoke about the Frankfurt School’s 11-point plan, how it was set out to destroy nationalism in the 1920s and how it is all coming true today.

http://bnptv.org.uk/2011/09/frankfurt-school-new-world-order/